Friday, November 29, 2019
The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students
The Most Dangerous Game Essay The Most Dangerous Game Essay Have you ever had feelings about something that later changed? In The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Conel, I will show how one character changes his opinion about something after he has experienced it himself. Almost all of us have said Oh thats easy or I could do that any day! and then find out that the task is harder then it looked. In a summary, The Most Dangerous Game is a story about a man named Rainsford whom gets stranded on an island with a crazed general. This general is named General Zaroff. Rainsford was an excellent hunter who wrote many books about hunting. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now General Zaroff was a fan of Rainsfords books, so he immediately knew who Rainsford was when he found him. General Zaroff let Rainsford in and treated him to good food and plenty of rest. Zaroff was talking to Rainsford about hunting, and then Zaroff explained his passion, he hunted humans because animals were no challenge. Rainsford did not like this and tried to avoid Zaroff. Soon after this, Zaroff gave Rainsford a choice, it was either Zaroff would hunt Rainsford for three days or Rainsford will get whipped in the dungeon of Zaroffs home until he agrees to be hunted. Unwillingly, Rainsford picks to go hunting and hopes to survive the three days. If he did live, he would be set free with money and new clothing, so Zaroff says On the hunting trip, Rainsford successfully avoids Zaroff for three days by hiding and setting up traps, then he pretends to go to sea by freeing the boats. Finally, he sneaks into Zaroffs room and hides there until Zaroff arrives. Eventually, he confronts Zaroff and fights him to his death. After that, Rainsford gets the best night sleep he has ever had. I feel that Richard Conel tried to express a feeling of change within the characters mind. Before Rainsford was ever hunted, he was cruel to animals. He would hunt them just for the fun of killing them. Rainsford had no sympathy for animals before he encountered Zaroff. During the middle of the story, Rainsford becomes the next prey of General Zaroff. Due to the stress and the feelings of fear, I think Rainsford might have changed his mind about animals and how they feel. After this event, I know that Rainsford has now become sorry for his ideas about animals and how they should be treated. I know that Rainsford is a dynamic character because of his ability to positively change his feelings. I think you sometimes need a tragic event to finally change a stubborn persons mind. In conclusion, I feel that the author, Richard Conel, tried to show how people could change by experiencing different situations. Rainsford, after becoming the hunted prey himself, corrected his faults and formed new opinions about hunting and standing up for the rights of animals. Rainsford is an excellent role model for positive change! English . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay Have you ever had feelings about something that later changed? In The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Conel, I will show how one character changes his opinion about something after he has experienced it himself. Almost all of us have said Oh thats easy or I could do that any day! and then find out that the task is harder then it looked. In a summary, The Most Dangerous Game Essay is a story about a man named Rainsford whom gets stranded on an island with a crazed general. This general is named General Zaroff. Rainsford was an excellent hunter who wrote many books about hunting. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now General Zaroff was a fan of Rainsfords books, so he immediately knew who Rainsford was when he found him. General Zaroff let Rainsford in and treated him to good food and plenty of rest. Zaroff was talking to Rainsford about hunting, and then Zaroff explained his passion, he hunted humans because animals were no challenge. Rainsford did not like this and tried to avoid Zaroff. Soon after this, Zaroff gave Rainsford a choice, it was either Zaroff would hunt Rainsford for three days or Rainsford will get whipped in the dungeon of Zaroffs home until he agrees to be hunted. Unwillingly, Rainsford picks to go hunting and hopes to survive the three days. If he did live, he would be set free with money and new clothing, so Zaroff says On the hunting trip, Rainsford successfully avoids Zaroff for three days by hiding and setting up traps, then he pretends to go to sea by freeing the boats. Finally, he sneaks into Zaroffs room and hides there until Zaroff arrives. Eventually, he confronts Zaroff and fights him to his death. After that, Rainsford gets the best night sleep he has ever had. I feel that Richard Conel tried to express a feeling of change within the characters mind. Before Rainsford was ever hunted, he was cruel to animals. He would hunt them just for the fun of killing them. Rainsford had no sympathy for animals before he encountered Zaroff. During the middle of the story, Rainsford becomes the next prey of General Zaroff. Due to the stress and the feelings of fear, I think Rainsford might have changed his mind about animals and how they feel. After this event, I know that Rainsford has now become sorry for his ideas about animals and how they should be treated. I know that Rainsford is a dynamic character because of his ability to positively change his feelings. I think you sometimes need a tragic event to finally change a stubborn persons mind. In conclusion, I feel that the author, Richard Conel, tried to show how people could change by experiencing different situations. Rainsford, after becoming the hunted prey himself, corrected his faults and formed new opinions about hunting and standing up for the rights of animals. Rainsford is an excellent role model for positive change! Category: English . the most dangerous game Essay Example For Students the most dangerous game Essay Richard Connells the most dangerous game Essay is a very exciting story of a manhunt. This story made me think about the morality of hunting: Humans are the cleverest creatures on earth, but does it give them a license to kill the other animals and even human beings weaker than themselves? I give below a short summary of the story to set the scene and then I will explore the ethics involved in hunting as a sport. The Most Dangerous Game presents the story of a hunter, General Zaroff, who finds hunting human beings as the most dangerous and fascinating sport. He likes hunting humans because human beings, unlike the other animals, can reason better and so provide a richer thrill for the hunter. He does not think hunting human beings is an immoral act because he believes in the theory of might is right and that the strong have the right to kill the weak. We will write a custom essay on the most dangerous game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now However in the story General Zaroff fails to hunt down Rainsford, who had the ill fortune to accidentally slip overboard a yacht and swim to the shore, seek shelter in the Generals chateau in the midst of a jungle, and become General Zaroffs quarry for three days. Nevertheless, Rainsford, who believes it is immoral to hunt human beings, was clever and desperatehe gave General Zaroff the slip in the manhunt and killed the General. So The hunter who craved to pit his wits against the victims wits for the Sake of excitement met his end. In my opinion Rainsford, who was also a great hunter, learnt the valuable lesson that it is cruel and immoral to hunt innocent animals for the sake of mere excitement and that hunting is not the best, as he formerly believed, but the worst sport in the world. He knew full well what it meant to feel the fear of pain and the fear of death. General Zaroff believed in the law of the jungle, that is, Might is right. So he felt there was nothing wrong in killing animals and even low-bred or weak human beings for excitement. According to him, the earth belonged to the strong and only they are fit to survive. To be weak is to forfeit the right to exist. However, this theory can be challenged in several ways. First And foremost, what is strength? It does not necessarily mean physical strength. A strong creature like the elephant is tamed and domesticated by a human who is relatively a weaker creature. If to be strong is to be clever, then a fox may be stronger than a lion. If strength lies in wisdom, an ant probably is no less wise than even a human being. So it is very difficult to say who are the fit and who have the right to survive. Furthermore, there is no reason whatsoever to claim the right of the strong to kill the weak. The weak have the right to live and many weak creatures thrive splendidly. Darwins theory of evolution teaches us that in the struggle For existence only the fit survive. But it does not tell us that the Weak are unfit. As a matter of fact, many strong creatures like mammoths and dinosaurs failed in the struggle for existence and became extinct, while puny and weak creatures like the cockroach or the common fly are living and flourishing. This proves that it is not physical strength that guarantees fitness and the license to live. Survival is a more complicated affair than mere strength. If we look at the history of evolution we see that human Beings have been very successful in the struggle for existence. One of the reasons for this may be that man does not live by bread alone and that the human society has developed a set of civilizing virtues like charity, kindness, and morality. .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .postImageUrl , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:hover , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:visited , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:active { border:0!important; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:active , .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1 .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uce024e63782fb080e5ace2be4e72f1a1:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Leadership: The King's Speech Essay We have been taught that it is immoral to destroy life. We have no right to destroy what we cannot create, and other animals are our fellow creatures. Our knowledge of ecology also teaches us that by killing animals we may be tampering with the delicate ecosystem and inviting our own destruction. Human beings are probably the most intelligent creatures on earth. That is why they have a great responsibility of keeping intact the life of the earth. Indiscriminate killing for sport is an uncivilized and anti-intellectual . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay Richard Connells The Most Dangerous Game Essay is a story about hunting. The title describes it as the most dangerous. However, we do not find this out until the proagonist, Sange Rainsford meets the antagonist General Zaroff. The story also consists of many types of conflict to build suspense. First, there is external conflict when Rainsford fallsfrom the ship into the ocean. It is Rainsford against nature. Can he survive? He manages to swim to a nearby island owned by Zaroff. He takes Rainsford in and wines and dines him. Zaroff questions Rainsford. He finds out that Rainsford is an author of a hunting magazine. Zaroff finds this interesting. Therefore, he lets Rainsford know about his game Rainsford is informed he will become part of this game. Now, we see another type of enternal conflict. Rainsford is terrified. He refuses to condone cold-blooded murder; he thinks this is inmoral. Zaroff gives Rainsford the choice of playing his game or he can deal with Ivan. Zaroff gives Rainsford a head start. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The hunt can last for three days or until one of them kill the other. The game has now become physical. It is Rainsford against Zaroff.Finally, Rainsford tades control of his terror. He figures out a way to beat Zaroff at his own game. Rainsford swims to Zaroffs home. He waits for Zaroff, then his fight for survival is over. The hunter becomes th hunted. Which is the more dnagerous of two? This is a true story of one mans bravery and ability to fight to the end. What would you do . The most dangerous game Essay Example For Students The most dangerous game Essay Richard Connells The most dangerous game Essay is a very exciting story of a manhunt. This story made me think about the morality of hunting: Humans are the cleverest creatures on earth, but does it give them a license to kill the other animals and even human beings weaker than themselves? I give below a short summary of the story to set the scene and then I will explore the ethics involved in hunting as a sport. The Most Dangerous Game presents the story of a hunter, General Zaroff, who finds hunting human beings as the most dangerous and fascinating sport. He likes hunting humans because human beings, unlike the other animals, can reason better and so provide a richer thrill for the hunter. He does not think hunting human beings is an immoral act because he believes in the theory of might is right and that the strong have the right to kill the weak. We will write a custom essay on The most dangerous game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now However in the story General Zaroff fails to hunt down Rainsford, who had the ill fortune to accidentally slip overboard a yacht and swim to the shore, seek shelter in the Generals chateau in the midst of a jungle, and become General Zaroffs quarry for three days. Nevertheless, Rainsford, who believes it is immoral to hunt human beings, was clever and desperatehe gave General Zaroff the slip in the manhunt and killed the General. So The hunter who craved to pit his wits against the victims wits for the Sake of excitement met his end. In my opinion Rainsford, who was also a great hunter, learnt the valuable lesson that it is cruel and immoral to hunt innocent animals for the sake of mere excitement and that hunting is not the best, as he formerly believed, but the worst sport in the world. He knew full well what it meant to feel the fear of pain and the fear of death. General Zaroff believed in the law of the jungle, that is, Might is right. So he felt there was nothing wrong in killing animals and even low-bred or weak human beings for excitement. According to him, the earth belonged to the strong and only they are fit to survive. To be weak is to forfeit the right to exist. However, this theory can be challenged in several ways. First And foremost, what is strength? It does not necessarily mean physical strength. A strong creature like the elephant is tamed and domesticated by a human who is relatively a weaker creature. If to be strong is to be clever, then a fox may be stronger than a lion. If strength lies in wisdom, an ant probably is no less wise than even a human being. So it is very difficult to say who are the fit and who have the right to survive. Furthermore, there is no reason whatsoever to claim the right of the strong to kill the weak. The weak have the right to live and many weak creatures thrive splendidly. Darwins theory of evolution teaches us that in the struggle For existence only the fit survive. But it does not tell us that the Weak are unfit. As a matter of fact, many strong creatures like mammoths and dinosaurs failed in the struggle for existence and became extinct, while puny and weak creatures like the cockroach or the common fly are living and flourishing. This proves that it is not physical strength that guarantees fitness and the license to live. Survival is a more complicated affair than mere strength. If we look at the history of evolution we see that human Beings have been very successful in the struggle for existence. One of the reasons for this may be that man does not live by bread alone and that the human society has developed a set of civilizing virtues like charity, kindness, and morality. .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .postImageUrl , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:hover , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:visited , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:active { border:0!important; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:active , .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc13f4dd28b53dc7c7622d0fe5210a14e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: michael jordan Essay Thesis We have been taught that it is immoral to destroy life. We have no right to destroy what we cannot create, and other animals are our fellow creatures. Our knowledge of ecology also teaches us that by killing animals we may be tampering with the delicate ecosystem and inviting our own destruction. Human beings are probably the most intelligent creatures on earth. That is why they have a great responsibility of keeping intact the life of the earth. Indiscriminate killing for sport is an uncivilized and anti-intellectual . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay In the story, The Most Dangerous Game Essay by Richard Connell, Rainsford divides men into two classes of people, the hunters and the huntees. The explanation of this statement is that in life, everyone is either a victim of society or are out to get what they want. Rainsford says this becuase he hunted animals and never expected to be hunted himself. He considers himself a hunter because he traveled all around the world and wrote books on hunting. This changes when Zaroff was hunting Rainsford and chasing him which made Rainsford feel scared and nervous. Zaroff thinks it is too easy to hunt animals so he thought it would be more of a challenge to hunt humans. Zaroff and Rainsford travel and are experienced hunters, but Zaroff likes to hunt humans and he stops hunting animals because hes bored. They used to think hunting was just hunting, but they never felt what the animals felt when they were hunted. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now This statement can apply to society. The hunter is like the boss, he has power and the huntee is weaker and lower. This can apply to a lot of situations including a teacher and student, a parent and child, or a policeman and a criminal. Children have to listen to their parents and do what they say. If they dont, they will getin trouble or get yelled at. I consider myself a huntee because I have to obey my parents and ask their permission before I do something. If I do go out without my parents permission, I can get in trouble. This will change a lot when I am older and live on my own. If I work and have a boss, I would have to ask him before I do something. If I am the boss, employees will have to listen to me. This is why I consider myself a huntee. . The most dangerous game Essay Example For Students The most dangerous game Essay The short story The most dangerous game Essay by Richard Connell is about the hunter and the hunted but later in the story it becomes ironic because it turns into a game were the hunter becomes the hunted. It turns into a chase of competition and of survival. Two sailors Rainsford and his partner Whitney sailed in to the darkness of the of sea. Their purpose was to hunt, they called it the greatest sport. They were hunters and headed to the Amazon to hunt vicious animals such as Jaguars, and tigers. They sailed to an island called Ship-Trap Island. Sailors feared this island and had curious dread of such a scarry place. The sky was filled with darkness when suddently he heard Three gun shots that were fired, and heard them again and again. Then he heard a scream while smoking a pipe when suddently the pipe fell and as he tried to reach for it he whent down into the sea were the waves swallowed his screams. Nobody could have heard him as the ocean swallowed his screams and the only chance of survival was to swim. Rainsford swam towards the screams and ended up in the Island. We will write a custom essay on The most dangerous game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now He walked on the shoreline and later found a place that looked like a mansion. There he met General Zaroff who bought the island to hunt. He was indeed a sporstman who invented a new sensation of the hunting game. His game was to train those men whos ships were wrecked and ended up in that island, and then provide them with food and a knife for three days. Once they were trained they were led out into the island as a head start while Zaroff chase after them and tried to hunt them down. If They survived during those three days they had won the game and they were let free but in the other case if they were found they were killed. Zaroff never lost the game so if one of the men being hunted was about to survive he would release the hounds to chased after them. Rainsford rested and the next morning had a dispute with Zaroff and told him that this hunting style was to brutal. In this argument Zaroff got mad and at this point in the story Raisford became the hunted. He was let loose into the island were he was to prepare himself for the most dangerous game of his life, the survival of the fittest. The first night was panicking and worried Rainsford as he hidded on top of a tree. The next day he set up a trap but Zaroff didnt fall for it and he almost got caught when Zaroff was right next to the bushes were Rainsford was hiding. the last day he set up a pitfall and while Zarroff and his servant were serching, his servant unfortunately fell into the pit. Rainsford got out of the Island trying to escape by swimming out into the ocean and swam back to the mansion and when Zaroff returned Rainsford switched the game around and proposed him to become the hunted. I like this short story because Rainsford was wise in making traps wich allowed Zaroff to take more time trying to find him and did them successfully wich helped him survive those three days. I also liked how the story ended it was kind of ironic the way Rainsfored changed the game around and became the hunter and Zaroff became the hunted. I thought it was a good idea because this way Zaroff would realise that his game of hunting people was wrong and this would teach him a lesson. .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .postImageUrl , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:hover , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:visited , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:active { border:0!important; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:active , .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u96f38e1ac2cbde2f80ad30e25136737a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Critical accounting theory EssayBibliography: . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay The Most Dangerous Game Essay Have you ever had feelings about something that later changed? In The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Conel, I will show how one character changes his opinion about something after he has experienced it himself. Almost all of us have said Oh thats easy; or ;I could do that any day!; and then find out that the task is harder then it looked. In a summary, ;The Most Dangerous Game; is a story about a man named Rainsford whom gets stranded on an island with a crazed general. This general is named General Zaroff. Rainsford was an excellent hunter who wrote many books about hunting. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now General Zaroff was a fan of Rainsfords books, so he immediately knew who Rainsford was when he found him. General Zaroff let Rainsford in and treated him to good food and plenty of rest. Zaroff was talking to Rainsford about hunting, and then Zaroff explained his passion, he hunted humans because animals were no challenge. Rainsford did not like this and tried to avoid Zaroff. Soon after this, Zaroff gave Rainsford a choice, it was either Zaroff would hunt Rainsford for three days or Rainsford will get whipped in the dungeon of Zaroffs home until he agrees to be hunted. Unwillingly, Rainsford picks to go hunting and hopes to survive the three days. If he did live, he would be set free with money and new clothing, so Zaroff says On the hunting trip, Rainsford successfully avoids Zaroff for three days by hiding and setting up traps, then he pretends to go to sea by freeing the boats. Finally, he sneaks into Zaroffs room and hides there until Zaroff arrives. Eventually, he confronts Zaroff and fights him to his death. After that, Rainsford gets the best night sleep he has ever had. I feel that Richard Conel tried to express a feeling of change within the characters mind. Before Rainsford was ever hunted, he was cruel to animals. He would hunt them just for the fun of killing them. Rainsford had no sympathy for animals before he encountered Zaroff. During the middle of the story, Rainsford becomes the next prey of General Zaroff. Due to the stress and the feelings of fear, I think Rainsford might have changed his mind about animals and how they feel. After this event, I know that Rainsford has now become sorry for his ideas about animals and how they should be treated. I know that Rainsford is a dynamic character because of his ability to positively change his feelings. I think you sometimes need a tragic event to finally change a stubborn persons mind. In conclusion, I feel that the author, Richard Conel, tried to show how people could change by experiencing different situations. Rainsford, after becoming the hunted prey himself, corrected his faults and formed new opinions about hunting and standing up for the rights of animals. Rainsford is an excellent role model for positive change! . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay The Most Dangerous Game Essay, by Richard Cornell was a story which Mr.Cornell used 8 aspects of fiction to show his point of view that one who has intellect can overcome one who has intelligence or instinct. The characters used in the story gave the author a way to make his point of view come clear to his audience. The story uses sequence of events. The plot is how the story goes about. The setting is the surroundings of the story, or where it takes place. The suspense is the temporary holding of the information to keep the reading interested, and to keep the reader guessing and wanting to know what will happen so they will continue reading your story. Foreshadowing is the readers way of telling the future, in other words the writer is giving clues out to the reader so that the reader can produce a hypothesis of what will happen, usually the reader is right, its like suspense, when the reader wants to find out if he is right or wrong, it keeps the reader interested. Fantasy is when the reader suspends his disbelief in the story in order to enjoy the work of fiction, in other words the reader just stops disbelieving that some of the things in the story are impossible, and cannot happen. Images are symbols used by the author to reflect the point of view. These 8 aspects of fiction were used by Richard Cornell, in the, Most Dangerous Game, to reveal his point of view that one who has intellect can overcome one who has intelligence or instinct. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The characters in the story were Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Now in the story Sanger Rainsford is the victim, and General Zaroff is the predator. Now Sanger Rainsford was a hunter, he was fearless, brave, strong, and smart. He claims that he is superior to the animals that he kills. But when he is being hunted himself, his point of view changes. General Zaroff is a hunter, now he hunts animals for sport. So he goes on a deserted island and hunts animals. A while has passed and it looks like all the animals on the island have been hunted and killed. General Zaroff then finds Sanger Rainsford washed up onto the island and he thinks, why dont I hunt him, so thats what he does. So General Zaroff becomes a people hunter, and Sanger Rainsford becomes his victim. Now the story as I have said before gave the author a way to express his moral or lesson. So he puts Sanger Rainsford on a ship, which sinks at sea, and washes him up on an island where a man named General Zaroff hunts for a living. He buts General Zaroff to hunt him, to show his point. But since Sanger Rainsford has intellect, he can survive, unlike the animals who have intelligence and instinct. At the end of the hunted, Sanger Rainsford makes it out alive using his knowledge and reason. The plot is the sequence of events, and they go like this: 1.Rainsford hunts animals, 2.He goes out to sea, 3. Gets washed up on an island, 4.Gets hunted by Zaroff, 5.Tries to leave, 6.Cant escape, 7.He has to use reason to beat his opponent and win the fight of life or death, 8.Rainsford wins the game, 9. He leaves. As you can see, the author uses the plot to make sure the story makes sense and goes in order. The setting is very important in a story. The reader needs to know where the characters are. So he/she can get a picture in their head of the scene. Well this story like I have mentioned a few times, takes place on a deserted island, in the middle of nowhere, and Rainsford is in the jungle being hunted. .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .postImageUrl , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:hover , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:visited , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:active { border:0!important; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:active , .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u372a025ce42850f984c7e75b00eaa5ab:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Who Is The Inspector In An Inspector Calls Essay The scene is very important in making the story viewable in the mind of the reader. Suspense is also an important part of a story. If there is no suspense in the story, the reader wont want to keep reading your story, theyll say its boring. Suspense keeps this from happening. You make the story exciting so the reader can continue reading. In the story the . The most dangerous game Essay Example For Students The most dangerous game Essay Richard Connells ;The most dangerous game Essay; is a very exciting story of a manhunt. This story made me think about the morality of hunting: Humans are the cleverest creatures on earth, but does it give them a license to kill the other animals and even human beings weaker than themselves? I give below a short summary of the story to set the scene and then I will explore the ethics involved in hunting as a sport. ;The Most Dangerous Game; presents the story of a hunter, General Zaroff, who finds hunting human beings as the most dangerous and fascinating sport. He likes hunting humans because human beings, unlike the other animals, can reason better and so provide a richer thrill for the hunter. He does not think hunting human beings is an immoral act because he believes in the theory of might is right and that the strong have the right to kill the weak. We will write a custom essay on The most dangerous game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now However in the story General Zaroff fails to hunt down Rainsford, who had the ill fortune to accidentally slip overboard a yacht and swim to the shore, seek shelter in the Generals chateau in the midst of a jungle, and become General Zaroffs quarry for three days. Nevertheless, Rainsford, who believes it is immoral to hunt human beings, was clever and desperatehe gave General Zaroff the slip in the manhunt and killed the General. So The hunter who craved to pit his wits against the victims wits for the Sake of excitement met his end. In my opinion Rainsford, who was also a great hunter, learnt the valuable lesson that it is cruel and immoral to hunt innocent animals for the sake of mere excitement and that hunting is not the best, as he formerly believed, but the worst sport in the world. He knew full well what it meant to feel the fear of pain and the fear of death. General Zaroff believed in the law of the jungle, that is, Might is right. So he felt there was nothing wrong in killing animals and even low-bred or weak human beings for excitement. According to him, the earth belonged to the strong and only they are fit to survive. To be weak is to forfeit the right to exist. However, this theory can be challenged in several ways. First And foremost, what is strength? It does not necessarily mean physical strength. A strong creature like the elephant is tamed and domesticated by a human who is relatively a weaker creature. If to be strong is to be clever, then a fox may be stronger than a lion. If strength lies in wisdom, an ant probably is no less wise than even a human being. So it is very difficult to say who are the fit and who have the right to survive. Furthermore, there is no reason whatsoever to claim the right of the strong to kill the weak. The weak have the right to live and many weak creatures thrive splendidly. Darwins theory of evolution teaches us that in the struggle For existence only the fit survive. But it does not tell us that the Weak are unfit. As a matter of fact, many strong creatures like mammoths and dinosaurs failed in the struggle for existence and became extinct, while puny and weak creatures like the cockroach or the common fly are living and flourishing. This proves that it is not physical strength that guarantees fitness and the license to live. Survival is a more complicated affair than mere strength. If we look at the history of evolution we see that human Beings have been very successful in the struggle for existence. One of the reasons for this may be that man does not live by bread alone and that the human society has developed a set of civilizing virtues like charity, kindness, and morality. .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .postImageUrl , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:hover , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:visited , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:active { border:0!important; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:active , .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377 .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u548b24f03c200a7f00b26c696a4f1377:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: From Dirt to Duchess Essay We have been taught that it is immoral to destroy life. We have no right to destroy what we cannot create, and other animals are our fellow creatures. Our knowledge of ecology also teaches us that by killing animals we may be tampering with the delicate ecosystem and inviting our own destruction. Human beings are probably the most intelligent creatures on earth. That is why they have a great responsibility of keeping intact the life of the earth. Indiscriminate killing for sport is an uncivilized and anti-intellectual . The Most Dangerous Game Essay Example For Students The Most Dangerous Game Essay The Most Dangerous GameHave you ever had feelings about something that later changed? In The MostDangerous Game by Richard Conel, I will show how one character changes hisopinion about something after he has experienced it himself. Almost all of ushave said Oh thats easy or I could do that any day! and then find out thatthe task is harder then it looked. In a summary, The Most Dangerous Game is astory about a man named Rainsford whom gets stranded on an island with a crazedgeneral. This general is named General Zaroff. Rainsford was an excellenthunter who wrote many books about hunting. General Zaroff was a fan ofRainsfords books, so he immediately knew who Rainsford was when he found him. We will write a custom essay on The Most Dangerous Game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now General Zaroff let Rainsford in and treated him to good food and plenty of rest. Zaroff was talking to Rainsford about hunting, and then Zaroff explained hispassion, he hunted humans because animals were no challenge. Rainsford did notlike this and tried to avoid Zaroff. Soon after this, Zaroff gave Rainsford achoice, it was either Zaroff would hunt Rainsford for three days or Rainsfordwill get whipped in the dungeon of Zaroffs home until he agrees to be hunted. Unwillingly, Rainsford picks to go hunting and hopes to survive the three days. If he did live, he would be set free with money and new clothing, so Zaroff saysOn the hunting trip, Rainsford successfully avoids Zaroff for three days byhiding and setting up traps, then he pretends to go to sea by freeing the boats. Finally, he sneaks into Zaroffs room and hides there until Zaroff arrives. Eventually, he confronts Zaroff and fights him to his death. After that,Rainsford gets the best night sleep he has ever had. I feel that Richard Conel tried to express a feeling of change within thecharacters mind. Before Rainsford was ever hunted, he was cruel to animals. He would hunt them just for the fun of killing them. Rainsford had no sympathyfor animals before he encountered Zaroff. During the middle of the story, Rainsford becomes the next prey of GeneralZaroff. Due to the stress and the feelings of fear, I think Rainsford mighthave changed his mind about animals and how they feel. After this event, I know that Rainsford has now become sorry for his ideas aboutanimals and how they should be treated. I know that Rainsford is a dynamiccharacter because of his ability to positively change his feelings. I think yousometimes need a tragic event to finally change a stubborn persons mind. In conclusion, I feel that the author, Richard Conel, tried to show how peoplecould change by experiencing different situations. Rainsford, after becoming thehunted prey himself, corrected his faults and formed new opinions about huntingand standing up for the rights of animals. Rainsford is an excellent role modelfor positive change! THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME Essay Example For Students THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME Essay There is something about hunting that General Zaroff did not liked any more. This thing that he disliked was that it was not a challenge for him to kill his quarry. He had been a hunter for such a long time that he was an expert. Rainsford was also a great hunter, he was on a boat when he heard some gun shoots, he went to check out were the shoots came from all of the suden he lost balance and he fell over the board. It was a dark night in the caribean waters. He swam behid the boat yelling to the his friends, but they didnt listened. Rainsford decided to survive, so he swam looking for the island they were sailing next to. Rainsford finaly reached the island. It was a big place with many trees and palms, almost like a jungle. He walked and found a place to rest, he went to sleep as son as he closed his eyes. Wen he woked up it was late afternoon, he knew tha becouse of the sun. We will write a custom essay on THE MOST DANGEROUS GAME specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now He found an empty cartridge when he was walking towards a big place with so many bright lights. He walked and walked untill he reached the house of General Zaroff where he had diner and a bed to sleep. General Zaroff told him about his new hunting game, which Rainsford though stupid. This hunting game was a game were Genral Zaroff hunted men inside the island. Rainsford said that what the General was doing was not huntig but murdering. The day came when Rainsford became the quarry for the General, he hided on many places because he was scared, untill the moment he decided to kill or be killed. Finaly Rainsford killed Ivan, the Generals servant, and also the dogs. The General was sad because of his loss, so he went up to his bedroom knowing he had lost the game. Rainsford appeared from behind a courtain an killed the General. Now Rainsford realized that the hunter had become the huntee. . The most dangerous game Essay Example For Students The most dangerous game Essay I think The most dangerous game Essay is an escape book whose principal emphasis is on plot. The story is about a hunter who after a series of unlucky events finds himself in an island with a man who hunts people for sports. The two main characters represent two opposite sides. Rainsford is a good person who respects humans life while General Zaroff is a kind of bad guy who has no value for human life. Suspense is the main element to make the story attractive. There is a mystery coming from the very beginning when Rainsford first hears about the Ship Trap Island. Then the second mystery is introduced when Zaroff tells Rainsford what the most dangerous game in the world is. The story comes to its climax when Rainsford is forced to join Zaroffs hunting game. The celebrated hunter now becomes the quarry. Readers curiosity, which combined with anxiety, has been greatly aroused at this moment. The question Who is going to win the game keeps them reading. We will write a custom essay on The most dangerous game specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now No one knows what will exactly happen until the answer comes out at last. The whole book is full of actions and conflicts. Rainsford conflicts with himself, with nature, with society and with Zaroff. There is no dull moment in the story. Something exciting is always happening. With the development of the plot, readers are left anxious to find out how Rainsford manages to escape from being caught. The ending of the story is a typical ending for the escape book. Rainsford finally kills Zaroff. The hunter and the hunted change their positions. The good defeats the evil. The happy ending gives every reader a kind of relief. The Most Dangerous Game is a good adventure book for people of all ages to enjoy. Thats why I think its an escape book rather than an interpretive book. Bibliography: .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.